AT SYSTEMATIZATION BERHAD
Malaysia | 0072.KL | ACE
Reference
Report Year: 2024
Source Files:
Sustainability Committee
No sustainability committee formed ⚠️
Reporting
Integrated Report, No specific framework mentioned ⚠️
GHG Accounting
AT SYSTEMATIZATION BERHAD's 2024 sustainability report lacks any mention of GHG accounting or carbon emission data. There is no information on Scope 1, 2, or 3 emissions, base year, boundary, or third-party verification. This represents a significant gap in environmental reporting. The company should prioritize establishing a framework for tracking and disclosing emissions data to align with global sustainability standards. Incorporating GHG Protocol or similar guidelines and seeking third-party verification would enhance credibility. As no biomass or biofuel usage is mentioned, biogenic emissions are not applicable. Overall, initiating GHG accounting is crucial for demonstrating environmental responsibility and meeting stakeholder expectations.
Emissions
| Scope | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Scope1 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data available on Scope 1 emissions. |
| Scope2 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data available on Scope 2 emissions. |
| Scope3 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data available on Scope 3 emissions. |
| Biogenic emissions | Not applicable → | No biomass or biofuel usage reported. |
Other Details
- Base year: Not specified
- Boundary inventory: Not specified
- Gwp basis: Not specified
- Standard: Not specified
- Data collection approach: Not specified
- Third party verification: Not specified
Efforts
Social Highlights
- 122 employees 🟢
- Limited data available ⚠️
- Limited data available ⚠️
- Limited data available ⚠️
- Limited data available ⚠️
Governance
- Salary disclosure: Can't find ⚠️
- Litigation: Can't find ⚠️
Report Quality
Basic Foundation with Significant Gaps 🟢⚠️. AT SYSTEMATIZATION BERHAD's 2024 integrated sustainability report provides a basic overview of social aspects, such as workforce demographics, with a reported total of 122 employees. However, the report lacks depth in critical areas. There are no quantifiable actions or measurable outcomes related to environmental performance, such as GHG emissions or waste reduction metrics. Additionally, governance disclosures, including CEO salary transparency and litigation information, are absent. Forward-looking commitments or sustainability targets are also not evident, limiting the report's strategic value. The content remains generic, with statements on non-discrimination and labor compliance lacking specific evidence or impact data. To improve, the company should incorporate specific metrics, adopt recognized reporting frameworks like GRI, and outline clear future goals for sustainability. Third-party verification could further enhance credibility.
Tags:
Looking for ESG Strategy & Improvement?
Disclaimer:
This is AI model generated summary based on certain rules set by Sustify.world perspective. If the reader finds the information is incorrect, they can always approach us by sending email admin@sustify.world.
Need Expert help?
Contact us TODAY for sustainability strategy, reporting, and outsourcing services.