VISDYNAMICS HOLDINGS BERHAD
Malaysia | 0120.KL | ACE
Reference
Report Year: 2024
Source Files:
Sustainability Committee
Sustainability Committee (Unknown pax) 🟢
- Materiality assessment 🟢
Reporting
GRI, Integrated Report 🟢
GHG Accounting
VisDynamics' GHG accounting efforts are currently underdeveloped as the 2024 report lacks critical data on Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions. There is no mention of a base year, emission boundaries, or adherence to standards like GHG Protocol or ISO 14064. Additionally, third-party verification is absent, which impacts credibility. The report does not address biogenic emissions, which is appropriate given no biomass or biofuel usage is mentioned. To improve, the company should establish a robust GHG inventory, adopt recognized standards, set a base year, and pursue external verification to enhance transparency and accountability in its sustainability journey.
Emissions
| Scope | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Scope1 | Not reported ⚠️ | Scope 1 emissions data not available in the report. |
| Scope2 | Not reported ⚠️ | Scope 2 emissions data not available in the report. |
| Scope3 | Not reported ⚠️ | Scope 3 emissions data not available in the report. |
| Biogenic emissions | Not applicable → | No biomass or biofuel usage reported. |
Other Details
- Base year: Not reported ⚠️
- Boundary inventory: Not reported ⚠️
- Gwp basis: Not reported ⚠️
- Standard: Not reported ⚠️
- Data collection approach: Not reported ⚠️
- Third party verification: Not reported ⚠️
- Carbon intensity: Not reported ⚠️
Efforts
- No data available ⚠️
- No data available ⚠️
- No data available ⚠️
- No data available ⚠️
Governance
- Salary disclosure: Can’t find ⚠️
- Litigation: Can’t find ⚠️
Report Quality
Room for Improvement in VisDynamics’ 2024 Sustainability Report. While the report demonstrates a foundational commitment to sustainability with references to GRI frameworks and an integrated reporting approach 🟢, it lacks depth in quantifiable actions and measurable outcomes. Key metrics, such as GHG emissions data, waste reduction, and environmental initiatives, are notably absent ⚠️. The materiality assessment and customer satisfaction score (96%) are positive highlights, but much of the content remains generic, with statements like 'commitment to sustainability' lacking supporting evidence. There are no forward-looking commitments or targets for emissions reduction or net-zero goals. To enhance future reports, VisDynamics should include specific, verifiable data on environmental and social impacts, adopt third-party verification for credibility, and outline clear, time-bound sustainability targets to demonstrate accountability and progress.
Tags:
Looking for ESG Strategy & Improvement?
Disclaimer:
This is AI model generated summary based on certain rules set by Sustify.world perspective. If the reader finds the information is incorrect, they can always approach us by sending email admin@sustify.world.
Need Expert help?
Contact us TODAY for sustainability strategy, reporting, and outsourcing services.