KUCHAI DEVELOPMENT BERHAD
Malaysia | 2186.KL | Main
Reference
Report Year: 2024
Source Files:
Sustainability Committee
No sustainability committee formed ⚠️
Reporting
GRI, SASB, Integrated Report 🟢
GHG Accounting
Kuchai Development Berhad's GHG accounting in FY2024 is notably underdeveloped. The report lacks data on Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, with no mention of a base year, GWP basis, or adherence to standards like GHG Protocol or ISO 14064. While the operational control approach is defined for boundary setting, this alone does not provide a comprehensive view of emissions. The absence of third-party verification further undermines credibility. A key improvement area is to establish a robust GHG inventory with absolute emission figures and pursue external assurance for transparency. Additionally, disclosing carbon intensity metrics could better reflect environmental impact relative to business operations.
Emissions
| Scope | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Scope1 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data on Scope 1 emissions provided. |
| Scope2 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data on Scope 2 emissions provided. |
| Scope3 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data on Scope 3 emissions provided. |
| Biogenic emissions | Not applicable → | No biomass or biofuel usage reported. |
Other Details
- Base year: Not specified ⚠️
- Boundary inventory: Operational control approach 🟢
- Gwp basis: Not specified ⚠️
- Standard: Not specified ⚠️
- Data collection approach: Not specified ⚠️
- Third party verification: Not verified ⚠️
- Carbon intensity: Not reported ⚠️
Efforts
Social Highlights
- Limited data available ⚠️
- Limited data available ⚠️
- Limited data available ⚠️
- Limited data available ⚠️
- Limited data available ⚠️
Governance
- Salary disclosure: Can’t find ⚠️
Report Quality
Room for Improvement in Kuchai Development Berhad's FY2024 sustainability report. While the report acknowledges the importance of sustainability and references globally recognized frameworks like GRI and SASB 🟢, it falls short in providing quantifiable actions or measurable outcomes. Statements remain largely generic, with a focus on intent rather than evidence of impact, such as specific emission reductions or social initiative results ⚠️. The absence of forward-looking commitments, like net-zero targets, limits the report's strategic depth. Additionally, the lack of third-party assurance and internal review undermines data reliability. To enhance future reports, Kuchai should prioritize quantifiable metrics, establish clear targets, and seek external verification for credibility. Incorporating detailed social and governance disclosures would also provide a more holistic view of sustainability efforts.
Tags:
Looking for ESG Strategy & Improvement?
Disclaimer:
This is AI model generated summary based on certain rules set by Sustify.world perspective. If the reader finds the information is incorrect, they can always approach us by sending email admin@sustify.world.
Need Expert help?
Contact us TODAY for sustainability strategy, reporting, and outsourcing services.