MINHO (M) BERHAD
Malaysia | 5576.KL | Main
Reference
Report Year: 2023
Source Files:
Sustainability Committee
No sustainability committee formed ⚠️
Reporting
Integrated Report, No specific framework mentioned ⚠️
GHG Accounting
MINHO (M) BERHAD's sustainability report for 2023 lacks detailed GHG accounting. There is no data on Scope 1, Scope 2, or Scope 3 emissions, nor any mention of base year, boundary, or inventory. The report does not specify standards like GHG Protocol or third-party verification. While the company acknowledges climate change risks and expresses intent to minimize its carbon footprint, there are no quantifiable metrics or actionable plans provided. Improvement is needed in establishing a robust GHG inventory, adopting recognized frameworks, and ensuring data transparency through verification. This would strengthen credibility and align with stakeholder expectations for climate resilience.
Emissions
| Scope | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Scope1 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data available for Scope 1 emissions. |
| Scope2 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data available for Scope 2 emissions. |
| Scope3 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data available for Scope 3 emissions. |
| Biogenic emissions | Not applicable → | No biomass or biofuel usage reported. |
Other Details
- Base year: Not specified ⚠️
- Boundary inventory: Not specified ⚠️
- Gwp basis: Not specified ⚠️
- Standard: Not specified ⚠️
- Data collection approach: Not specified ⚠️
- Third party verification: Not verified ⚠️
- Carbon intensity: Not reported ⚠️
Social Highlights
- Limited data available ⚠️
- Limited data available ⚠️
- Limited data available ⚠️
- Limited data available ⚠️
- Limited data available ⚠️
Governance
- Salary disclosure: Can't find ⚠️
- Litigation: Can't find ⚠️
Report Quality
Room for Improvement in MINHO (M) BERHAD's 2023 sustainability report ⚠️. The report acknowledges the importance of climate change and the need to address related risks, which is a positive starting point. However, it falls short in providing quantifiable actions or measurable outcomes. There are no specific metrics on emissions, waste reduction, or social impact, and the content remains largely generic, with statements like 'minimize carbon footprint' lacking supporting evidence or targets. Additionally, there are no forward-looking commitments or timelines for sustainability goals. To enhance credibility, the company should adopt recognized reporting frameworks like GRI or TCFD, include verifiable data, and outline clear, time-bound objectives. Incorporating third-party verification would also strengthen trust among stakeholders. Despite these gaps, the intent to address sustainability is evident and can serve as a foundation for future improvements 🟢.
Tags:
Looking for ESG Strategy & Improvement?
Disclaimer:
This is AI model generated summary based on certain rules set by Sustify.world perspective. If the reader finds the information is incorrect, they can always approach us by sending email admin@sustify.world.
Need Expert help?
Contact us TODAY for sustainability strategy, reporting, and outsourcing services.