KUB MALAYSIA BERHAD
Malaysia | 6874.KL | Main
Reference
Report Year: 2022
Source Files:
Sustainability Committee
Sustainability Committee (Unknown pax) 🟢
- Deliberating key matters 🟢
- Reviewing ESG risks 🟢
Reporting
Integrated Report, No specific framework mentioned ⚠️
GHG Accounting
KUB Malaysia Berhad's sustainability report for 2022 lacks detailed GHG accounting data. There is no reporting on Scope 1, 2, or 3 emissions, nor any mention of base year, boundary, inventory, or standards like GHG Protocol or ISO 14064. Additionally, there is no information on third-party verification or carbon intensity metrics. While the report highlights general environmental commitments, such as waste management and biodiversity conservation, it falls short in providing quantifiable emission metrics. To improve, the company should establish a comprehensive GHG inventory, adopt recognized frameworks, and seek third-party verification to enhance credibility and transparency in its environmental reporting.
Emissions
| Scope | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Scope1 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data on Scope 1 emissions provided. |
| Scope2 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data on Scope 2 emissions provided. |
| Scope3 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data on Scope 3 emissions provided. |
| Biogenic emissions | Not applicable → | No biomass or biofuel usage reported. |
Other Details
- Base year: Not reported ⚠️
- Boundary inventory: Not reported ⚠️
- Gwp basis: Not reported ⚠️
- Standard: Not reported ⚠️
- Data collection approach: Not reported ⚠️
- Third party verification: Not reported ⚠️
- Carbon intensity: Not reported ⚠️
Efforts
- Scheduled waste managed 🟢
- Agroecological practices 🌱
Social Highlights
- 74 members engaged 🟢
- Supported 12 flood-affected employees 🥗
- Special leave for vaccinations 🟢
- Limited data available ⚠️
- Limited data available ⚠️
Governance
- Salary disclosure: Can't find ⚠️
Report Quality
Appreciable foundation in KUB Malaysia Berhad's 2022 sustainability report, with a clear governance structure and commitment to ESG principles 🟢. The report details stakeholder engagement and materiality assessments, reflecting a structured approach to identifying priorities. However, it lacks quantifiable metrics in critical areas like GHG emissions and specific outcomes for environmental and social initiatives ⚠️. Vague statements such as 'committed to sustainability' are present without supporting data or evidence of impact. Forward-looking commitments, such as net-zero targets, are also missing. To strengthen future reports, the company should include measurable data on emissions, adopt recognized reporting frameworks like GRI or TCFD, and outline clear, time-bound sustainability goals. Enhancing transparency through third-party verification would further improve credibility and stakeholder trust.
Tags:
Looking for ESG Strategy & Improvement?
Disclaimer:
This is AI model generated summary based on certain rules set by Sustify.world perspective. If the reader finds the information is incorrect, they can always approach us by sending email admin@sustify.world.
Need Expert help?
Contact us TODAY for sustainability strategy, reporting, and outsourcing services.