PERMAJU INDUSTRIES BERHAD
Malaysia | 7080.KL | Main
Reference
Report Year: 2024
Source Files: Permaju_Industries_AR2024_Bursa_(Part_1).md, Permaju_Industries_AR2024_Bursa_(Part_2).md
Sustainability Committee
No sustainability committee formed ⚠️
Reporting
GRI, Integrated Report 🟢
GHG Accounting
Permaju Industries Berhad's 2024 sustainability report lacks detailed GHG accounting data. There is no information on Scope 1, 2, or 3 emissions, base year, boundary, or inventory. Additionally, critical elements such as GWP basis, data collection methods, and third-party verification are absent. While the report mentions emission management as a material issue, it fails to provide quantifiable metrics or evidence of progress. A significant improvement is needed in disclosing absolute emission figures and adopting a recognized standard like the GHG Protocol. Incorporating third-party verification would enhance credibility. Without these, the report does not offer a clear picture of the company’s environmental impact or reduction efforts.
Emissions
| Scope | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Scope1 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data provided in the report. |
| Scope2 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data provided in the report. |
| Scope3 | Not reported ⚠️ | No data provided in the report. |
| Biogenic emissions | Not applicable → | No biomass or biofuel usage reported. |
Other Details
- Base year: Not reported ⚠️
- Boundary inventory: Not reported ⚠️
- Gwp basis: Not reported ⚠️
- Standard: Not reported ⚠️
- Carbon intensity: Not reported ⚠️
Social Highlights
- 96 hours of training 🟢
Governance
- Salary disclosure: Can't find ⚠️
- Litigation: Can't find ⚠️
Report Quality
Room for Improvement in Permaju Industries Berhad's 2024 sustainability report. While the report identifies material sustainability matters and aligns with the GRI framework 🟢, it lacks depth in quantifiable actions and measurable outcomes. Generic statements about reducing environmental impact and contributing to communities are present, but there are no specific metrics or evidence to support these claims ⚠️. Forward-looking commitments or targets, such as net-zero goals, are also missing. The report could benefit from including detailed GHG emission data, third-party verification, and more social impact numbers beyond training hours. Adding concrete KPIs and progress tracking would strengthen credibility. Overall, the report provides a basic foundation but needs significant enhancement to meet best practices in sustainability reporting.
Tags:
Looking for ESG Strategy & Improvement?
Disclaimer:
This is AI model generated summary based on certain rules set by Sustify.world perspective. If the reader finds the information is incorrect, they can always approach us by sending email admin@sustify.world.
Need Expert help?
Contact us TODAY for sustainability strategy, reporting, and outsourcing services.